Whenever you’re seeking ars technica flash drive roundup- no surprises here pics, reviews or features we take them here for you to use. Sclick.net just collect the highest quality ars technica flash drive roundup- no surprises here pic, information or reviews for Sclick’s visitors to use. Sclick.net staff and users continually bring new best gadgets info.
ars technica flash drive roundup: no surprises here
It doesn’t take a genius to predict that over time, gadgets will be cheaper compared to their predecessors, and they’ll have improved performance as well. And that’s basically what Ars Technica’s 5-page 2009 flash drive roundup reveals: today’s flash drives are cheaper and perform better compared to the ones available in 2005. So is the report just a detailed look at the obvious? Yes and no. While the conclusion is a no-brainer, there are several gems of info that us consumers would do well to take note of, because in this case some brands are really better than the others, if only ever so slightly.
Ars’ Matt Woodward tested 8 flash drives from some of the most popular brands available today: OCZ, Patriot, Corsair, Sandisk, Kingston, SuperTalent, and PQI. The flash drives that were tested are in the $9 – $30 USD range; most of them sell for around $20 USD. As I said above, the long and winding road that Woodward took led him to the not-quite-sensational — but nonetheless positive — generalization: flash drives today are of decent, if not excellent, quality despite their low prices.
But the battle of the brands is no Linux vs. Mac vs. PC, where there’s no clear winner: the flash drives with the fastest read/write speeds are those made by OCZ and Patriot, while the cheap-ass Kingston drive came in dead last in nearly all of the tests. The overall winners in price-to-performance ratio were SuperTalent’s $19 USD Pico-B 4Gb drive and SanDisk’s $11 USD Cruzer Micro 4GB drive.
Sure, such differences may not be that obvious in actual use, but I think as geekier, more informed consumers we should take note of the brands that are not performing as well as their competitors, and support those that strive to come up with quality products. Since non-techies might not have the patience to wade through articles like this (they may not even know of Ars Technica or technabob), we should take this article as evidence enough for us to spread the word around: Kingston = meh.
Sclick.net is a gadgets review with figures, graphics, photos, images, videos, and such blog with visitors’ comments. The materials are uploaded by users or webmaster. All of the content on this blog (including figures, graphics, photos, images, videos, something like that.) is covered under Canadian, US and international copyright and trademark laws. These pics, graphics, photos, images, videos, and so on. have been collected from various public sources including many websites (blogs, etc.), considering to be in public domain. The data offered by Sclick.net is for general information purposes only, and are property of their respective owners. Sclick.net does not claim to hold exclusive rights on all posts, figures and videos published. Sclick.net has no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the blog or the informations. If you find any content, pictures, graphics, photographs, images, video recordings, and so on that you consider shouldn’t be here, send me a deletion message.